h1

Does “Facebook” Destroy Marriages?

December 23, 2009

According to one report, twenty Percent (20%) of recently-filed divorces mention the social-networking site, Facebook, as a contributing factor.  While this may surprise some, it does not  surprise us (except for the sheer magnitude).  Working to help people improve their marriages, while being heavily involved in social networking ourselves, we see that the danger is obvious and pervasive.   We have personally witnessed the rapid decline of seemingly-healthy marriages simply by following some of our friends on Facebook.  What do you think?

Check out the article here: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2780179/Divorces-blamed-on-Facebook.html?=&ATTR=News; The Gospel According to Matt understands that the source (SUN) is a tabloid newspaper, but believes the principle holds true even if the statistics are sketchy.

h1

Liberalism, Conservatism, and the Parable of the Prodigal Son

December 9, 2009

This month I am reading Tim Keller’s book “Prodigal God” for the third time.  The first time was a quick read.  The second time was a staff exercise.  The third time is in preparation for a sermon series.  With each reading, my appreciation for the Parable of the Prodigal Son grows exponentially.

Today it occurred to me that the lost younger son (in the Parable) represents modern-day liberalism, while the lost older son represents modern-day conservatism. (Although I don’t believe that Jesus ever had American politics in mind, it’s certainly relevant to the discussion.)

The lost younger son represents self-discovery and self-expression.  The lost older son represents moral conformity.  The lost younger son represents grace and tolerance.  The lost older son represents hard work and justice.  Again, the lost younger son parallels liberalism while the lost older son parallels conservatism.

Liberalism, the lost younger son, has the right heart but the wrong rules.  Conservatism, the lost older son, has the right rules but the wrong heart.  Either way, they’re both lost.

h1

“Peace to Men on Whom His Favor Rests”

December 2, 2009

In Luke 2:14, in the story of Jesus’ birth, angels appeared in the sky singing: Glory to God in the highest, and on earth, peace to men on whom His favor rests.

Peace to men.  Jesus came to bring peace to men.  Jesus came to show that God’s favor, His grace, rests upon us.  Jesus came to show us that there is a Prodigal God who loves us.  And Jesus came to save us for Him.  Jesus came to bring peace to men.  This Christmas season we need to embrace the true spirit of Christmas.  We don’t need to fight a culture-war.  We don’t need to take sides in the battle between the secular and the sacred.  We need to pray for peace and we need to bring peace.  Peace to the hungry who lack food.  Peace to the homeless who lack shelter.  Peace to the hurting who lack comfort.  Peace to the sinner who lacks salvation.  Christmas is about peace and reconciliation through the birth and the blood of Jesus Christ.

h1

Thanksgiving Tribute to our Moms

November 25, 2009

The Wednesday before thanksgiving will always be a melancholy day in our home.  The day before thanksgiving in 2005 my wife’s mother Sylvia passed into Life.  And the day before thanksgiving in 2007 my mom Vicki passed as well.  We find some comfort in the seeming sovereignty of their passing on the same day—how strange is that?  Anyway, thanksgiving carries extra-special significance for us because we remember all the blessings from God, but especially our mothers who raised us to know God.  They are greatly missed, and we think about them every single day.  But we do not grieve as ones who have no hope.  We believe that, through Jesus Christ, we will see them again.

h1

The Manhattan Declaration

November 24, 2009

“The Gospel According to Matt,” aka Matt Summers, endorses the Manhattan Declaration with one caveat: that it treats the issue of poverty as a symptom of the problem rather than a systemic part of the problem. Jesus offers more direction on helping the poor than He does any of the issues mentioned in the declaration.

For information (or to read) the Manhattan Declaration check out/contact: Michelle Farmer or Amy Anderson (770) 813-0000 or (770) 757-4900 cell mfarmer@demossgroup.com www.DeMossNews.com/ManhattanDeclaration

h1

Singing Praises to Allah…

November 24, 2009

I found the following song in my son’s backpack.  When I asked him what it was, he explained that it’s one of the songs he and his classmates are singing at music class (in the public school he attends).

“Ramadan comes once a year

Celebrate that Allah’s here

Fasting food for thirty days

Honoring [Him] with faithful praise

Celebrate with family

Holidays for all and me”

What happened to “separation of church and state?”  It was a great clause when used by proponents  to marginalize Christianity.  But now it has been cast aside for the sake of multiculturalism and pluralism.  Call me old-fashioned, but I want to go back to the good old days when religion was kept out of the schools altogether—like, you know, last year!

h1

On Leadership

November 22, 2009

To successfully lead an organization one must be committed, courageous, and captivating; and embody character.  If the organization is innately Christian then the leader must embody Christ-like character.  But to transform an “organization” into a “movement,” one must be able to lead other leaders.

h1

The Evolution of Religion in America

November 18, 2009

Think with me now…

We’ve gone from one primary religion (Christianity), to secularism (no primary religion), to pluralism (all religions–except the exclusive ones). However, since all religions are innately exclusive (except for unitarian/universalists) we’re back to secularism. (And the universalists only accept the inclusive religions which makes them exclusive–so they’re out too).

Maybe we should just elect leaders who’d like to be substitutes for God and make government the sole locus of authority!

Oh wait… nevermind.

h1

“Americanized” Christianity

October 14, 2009

Americanized Christianity might sound a bit like “weaponized uranium.”  If it doesn’t, it probably should, because it’s just as dangerous.

Lately I’ve noticed far too much racism, bigotry and especially partisanship in the church to even call it Christian.  I am not picking on the church I lead in particular; however, I am picking on the American church in general.

Really, I’m picking on those who cannot separate their politics from their religion.  That is not to say that religion shouldn’t affect politics, it most certainly should.  Too many people, however, let their politics affect their religion (i.e. they cannot divorce their political persuasion from their interpretation of the teachings of Jesus).

Case in point: I have a Facebook Friend whose “friends” are discussing the merits of taking up arms in a bloody revolution against the US government.  These “friends” are all Bible-believing Christians (so to speak).  I know they are having a rhetorical discussion that is full of false bravado; but still, the fact that it’s an item for discussion betrays a great deal of ignorance regarding the teachings of Christ and His earliest followers.

If I sound arrogant here, I apologize; but working in a fairly-urban environment has taught me a number of humbling truths.  Of utmost importance: There are a great deal of faithful, Bible-believing Christians on either side of the political aisle.

Those who focus on justice for the unborn are generally conservative.  Those who focus on justice for the poor are generally liberal.  Those who focus on the independence-aspect of freedom are generally conservative.  Those who focus on the community-aspect of freedom are generally liberal.  Those who focus on individual morality are generally conservative.  And those who focus on social morality are generally liberal.

Ironically, and in regard to the above-mentioned issues, they all tout biblically-based, Christian principles.

One significant problem in Americanized Christianity is that the extremists on both sides would prefer to put a bullet in the head of those who disagree with them than to walk “two miles” with them; and this is surely not the way of Christ.

I’m not calling for political moderation.  Nor am I calling people to come together and just “get along.”  I’m asking Christians to study the teachings of Christ and consider: Would Jesus, in our context, be conservative or liberal; would He be capitalist or communist; would He be Republican or Democrat; would He be all-of-the-above or none-of-the-above?

Frankly, I’m not sure He’d have anything to do with any of us!

h1

Michael Moore, Capitalism & Christianity

October 5, 2009

Most of my readers know that I operate from a conservative viewpoint (see my bio-page).  Although I am no partisan, I am not ashamed to be a conservative.  I believe the same values that made our nation strong will keep it strong:  Freedom, Independence, Liberty for All, Work Ethic, Justice and Fairness (as they are traditionally defined).  Capitalism is part of that system as well.

However, I also believe that we need to take spiritual inventory from time to time, as well as appreciate what the “other” viewpoints believe.  So I submit the following words from partisan filmmaker Michael Moore.  Some of his points are easily refutable.  Others are rather potent.  I’ll let you work it out in the ensuing discussion that is sure to take place.  Feel free to comment.

“Amidst all the Wall Street bad guys and corrupt members of Congress exposed in Capitalism: A Love Story, I pose a simple question in the movie: “Is capitalism a sin?” I go on to ask, “Would Jesus be a capitalist?” Would he belong to a hedge fund? Would he sell short? Would he approve of a system that has allowed the richest 1 percent to have more financial wealth than the 95 percent under them combined?

“I have come to believe that there is no getting around the fact that capitalism is opposite everything that Jesus (and Moses and Mohammed and Buddha) taught. All the great religions are clear about one thing: It is evil to take the majority of the pie and leave what’s left for everyone to fight over. Jesus said that the rich man would have a very hard time getting into heaven. He told us that we had to be our brother’s and sister’s keepers and that the riches that did exist were to be divided fairly. He said that if you failed to house the homeless and feed the hungry, you’d have a hard time finding the pin code to the pearly gates.

“I guess that’s bad news for us Americans. Here’s how we define “Blessed Are the Poor”: We now have the highest unemployment rate since 1983. There’s a foreclosure filing once every 7.5 seconds. 14,000 people every day lose their health insurance.

“At the same time, Wall Street bankers (“Blessed Are the Wealthy”?) are amassing more and more loot – and they do their best to pay little or no income tax (last year Goldman Sachs’ tax rate was a mere 1 percent!). Would Jesus approve of this? If not, why do we let such an evil system continue? It doesn’t seem you can call yourself a Capitalist and a Christian — because you cannot love your money and love your neighbor when you are denying your neighbor the ability to see a doctor just so you can have a better bottom line. That’s called “immoral” — and you are committing a sin when you benefit at the expense of others.”

Gospel According to Matt’s Opinion:  Jesus would have been neither capitalist nor socialist.  He would have been something else altogether.  What say you?

You can read Moore’s editorial in it’s entirity at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-moore/for-those-of-you-on-your_b_308948.html