Archive for October, 2008

h1

Redistribution of Wealth: Is it Christian?

October 28, 2008

A couple of nights ago I watched an interview with Geraldine Ferraro where she was asked about the latest Barak Obama flap regarding the “redistribution of wealth.”

Believing in the some such tenets she replied, “Christianity is the source of this idea.  Early Christians and the early Church believed and taught the redistribution of wealth for the sake of the poor,” (my loose paraphrase).

I’d like to appeal to my Bachelor’s Degree in Biblical Literature and/or my Master’s Degree in Theology to refute her misunderstanding; but it does not take a biblical scholar to read Acts 2-5 and conclude that any such “redistribution of wealth” in the early Church was purely voluntary, not a requirement for membership in the Church, and not commonly practiced except by a handful of very generous Christians.

Giving and sharing certainly are Christian values and spiritual disciplines, but they were never intended for imposition on a governmental tax system or to help the poor in general—they were intended as free will offerings to help poor “believers.”  If you weren’t part of the Church then you didn’t get the help—one of many reasons that people wanted to become part of the early Church.

Honestly, I have some respect for Geraldine Ferraro.  Before the politicians start quoting the Bible, however, they should try reading it.  And they should try knowing their political history as well.

With that being said, our responsibility as Christians toward all politicians is to pray for them and offer them our obedience and respect—whether or not they seem fit or worthy.

–Matt Summers, TH.m

Editors Note:  My intent in this article was not to discuss the merits of the “Redistribution of Wealth” per se, although I am certainly opposed to such an idea.  My intent was to address the theological and historical spin that it is a Christian idea.  Although Jesus has much to say about helping the poor, He has nothing to say about robbing from the rich to give to the poor, or taxing the rich to give to the poor.  Nothing.  Those who know theology know that the “Redistribution of Wealth” is not a Christian concept.  And those who know history know that it is a primary tenet of Marxism.   Ferraro, and those who agree with her, simply don’t know their theology or their history; otherwise they intend to mislead their audiences.  It is simply untrue to say that the “Redistribution of Wealth” is a Christian idea.

h1

Football in Fantasy Land

October 24, 2008

As many of you know, I’m one big football fan!

My favorite college team is the Oklahoma Sooners; however, if the Oklahoma State Cowboys knock off the Texas Longhorns this weekend I might just jump on the bandwagon—which would make me the only true OSU Cowboys fan in my family.

My favorite pro team is the San Francisco 49ers.  No band-wagon here, they stink, but I still check their news and stats five days a week.  Yes, it is a waste of time because the news is bad and the stats are even worse.  But I became a Niners fan when I was a boy, probably because I hated the Dallas Cowboys, and I cannot turn back now.

My dream season, of course, is for the the Sooners to win the National Championship in January and the Niners to win the World Championship in February.  With the Sooners it’s unlikely; with the Niners its virtually impossible.  Hey!  I can dream, right?

Speaking of Band-Wagon, if the Bears keep improving and winning games I might have to get on my oldest son’s band-wagon—he’s a Bears fan. 

Anyway, my dream of a championship season has been virtually squandered by mid-October.  Except for Fantasy Football.  I’m in a Fantasy League with a bunch of NFL neophytes.  They like to talk trash but they can’t hold a candle to my football IQ—actually, they can’t hold a candle to my IQ period.  And that’s not saying much!

Right now I’m like Barbaro, in the middle of the pack, gaining traction, moving ahead, surging for the victory…, wait, Barbaro shattered his leg and had to be put down…, bad analogy!  Or is it?  Only time in the fantasy world will tell!

Editor’s Note:  The views expressed in this post are not necessarily accepted by the Gospel According to Matt.  They are intended soley for the purpose of…, well…, who knows?  Does everything have to have a purpose!

h1

Thoughts on Marriage, Divorce & Remarriage

October 18, 2008
This is not intended to be a conclusive statement on marriage, divorce and remarriage.  Only some thoughts and notes as I continue to shape and reshape my understanding of these issues.

 

These particular notes come from Matthew 19 and 1 Corinthians 7.  To understand the notes the reader must compare them to the biblical passages mentioned.

 

Some will read this and recognize that their own marriage, divorce, or remarriage may have taken place “out of God’s will.”  Remember, God is gracious and forgives those who turn to Him in faith and obedience.

 

No doubt, some readers will find these thoughts to be old-fashioned, out-dated, and/or unrealistic.  My intent is not to define my view so much as the biblical view as it pertains to these two proof texts.

 

If the reader is an unbeliever or an antagonist, I expect disagreement.  I will post your disagreement if it is reasonable and respectful—I will not permit vulgarity, slander, or malicious content in the comment section.  I will likely not respond to comments.

 

Notes on Matthew 19:3-12

  • Notice the question:  “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason”?
    • God’s plan is one man for one woman: He “joins” us together in marriage.
    • Man should not attempt to separate (divorce) what God has joined together.
    • Divorce is permitted only as a concession, “Moses permitted…”
    • Divorce is permitted because people’s “hearts were hard.”
  • Back to the question: “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason”?
    • It is not lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason.
    • It is lawful for a man to divorce his wife if she has been sexually immoral.
  • Conclusion to the question:  It is lawful for a man to divorce his wife and remarry another woman ONLY in the case of “sexual immorality” on the part of his spouse.  In other words, the innocent party is permitted to marry another without being guilty of adultery.

Notes on 1 Corinthians 7

  • To the Married, Section One (1 Corinthians 7:1-7):
    • “Because of the present crisis” it is better not to marry (v. 26).
    • Marriage helps protect us from sexual immorality.
    • The husband and wife should maintain a healthy sexual relationship.
    • The only reason and husband and wife should abstain from the sexual relationship is a sort of fasting for spiritual growth; such fasting should only be temporary.
    • It is sinful to withhold sex from your marriage partner in most all circumstances.
  • To the married, Section Two (1 Corinthians 7:10-17):
    • The couple should not separate; however, if the couple separates, they should remain single or be reconciled to one another.
    • If an unbelieving spouse leaves a believing spouse, the believing spouse “is not bound” to the marriage (Permitted to remarry?  That is the big question!).
  • To the Unmarried (1 Corinthians 7:8-9):
    • “Unmarried” is someone who is not currently in a marriage, not necessarily someone who has never been married.
    • “Unmarried” can apply to people who have never been married, to people who are divorced, and to widows (see v. 11 where “unmarried” applies to a divorced woman).
    • “Because of the present crisis” it is better to remain unmarried (v. 26).
    • If they cannot remain unmarried, they are permitted to marry and/or remarry.
  • To the Widows (1 Corinthians 7:8-9):
    • “Widow” means bereaved and stricken of riches (normally refers to women).
    • Better to remain unmarried “Because of the present crisis” (v. 26).
    • If they cannot, they are permitted to marry.
  • To the Virgins (1 Corinthians 7:25-26):
    • “Virgin” normally refers to a young, unmarried girl (a maiden); however, it is very occasionally used to describe a chaste, moral man in Scripture.
    • If they can stay virgin, that is better, “Because of the present crisis” (v. 26).
    • If they want to marry, that is permitted.
    • No binding commands, only suggestions.
  • Conclusions on 1 Corinthians 7:
    • Paul does not describe his present marital “status,” just wishes that his audience would remain “as I am,” which is not described, but was evident to the Corinthian church.
    • Paul was a Pharisee and therefore was married at some point in the past, but not when he wrote the Corinthian letter.
    • It is my opinion that Paul’s faith in Christ drove his wife away from him—and that he permitted her to divorce him; he chose to remain unmarried rather than to remarry (because he felt more effective as a single man); it is also possible that Paul had been widowed (although he does not describe himself as such).
    • We do not know what “present crisis” caused Paul to tell people not to marry or remarry.

 Final Conclusions:

  • Both Jesus’ and Paul’s words carry equal weight—both are part of inspired, God-breathed, Scripture.  Thus, both must be considered.
  • God’s original plan is one man for one woman for all time.
  • Divorce and/or Remarriage are permitted as concession not as command.
  • A marriage can be lawfully dissolved by three circumstances:
    • The marriage is undone by death (the survivor is allowed to remarry).
    • The unbelieving spouse leaves a believing spouse (the believing spouse is held innocent).
    • If one spouse is found guilty of “sexual immorality” (the faithful spouse is held innocent).
  • Thus divorce is permitted (conceded not recommended) in only two circumstances:
    • In the case of dissolution of marriage by “sexual immorality.”  —Jesus
    • In the case of dissolution of marriage by an “unbelieving spouse.” —Paul

Matt’s Concession & Confession:

  • I am convinced that a marriage can be dissolved for certain things (see previous).
  • I am not convinced that permission to divorce is the same as permission to remarry.
  • However, it seems to me that remarriage is permitted as a lesser of two evils (as an alternative to unrelenting sexual temptation due to the dissolution of previous marriage).

Further Recommendation:

  • More extensive study on the meaning of “sexual immorality” is needed.
  • More extensive study on the Greek meaning of “virgin” is also needed.
  • More conclusive understanding of what “not bound” to a marriage means.
h1

Milestones

October 7, 2008

Ten years ago I started dating my wife.  I weighed 180 pounds, which certainly wasn’t skinny, but it wasn’t too hefty either.  After we started dating she moved to Africa to work as a Medical Missionary among the Masaii and Turkana Tribes of East Africa.  She lived in Africa for four months.  When she returned I had put on about 25-30 pounds (ouch) in her absence, and since she still loved me I decided to marry her (luckily she didn’t object).  By the time we married I weighed about 215 pounds.  And two years after we were married I weighed 238 pounds.  Do you see a trend here?

Realizing the dangerous health-path I was on, I decided that some things needed to change.  So I started working out regularly, and though I was getting in better shape, I just wasn’t losing weight.  Then I started some trendy diets and I yo-yo’d up and down between 215-230 five or six times over the next four or five years–never being able to break the 215 barrier, and always jumping back up to 230.  Then I just started eating better, and I gave up “sugar” drinks such as Soda Pop, Kool-aide, etc.  Although I started feeling better, and started hovering between 215-220, I still didn’t see significant gains in weight loss.  After my mom passed away last year, my weight again jumped into the 230s.

That’s when a friend named Mike, another friend named Theresa, and my Dad encouraged me to go for a sleep-study.  We discovered that I had a sleep disorder called “Sleep Apnia,” which pretty much prevented me from sleeping for about the last 15 years (Unknown to me I had been waking up about 80 times an hour for years, thus suppressing my metabolism and causing me to crave calories).  They prescribed a CPAP machine to curb the sleeping disorder, and I continued to try to eat better and exercise.

What happened?  I started sleeping better, craving less food, and having more effective workouts due to the increased energy; my metabolism has increased and it’s now easier to lose weight.  This past week I broke the 200lb barrier (that is, I got below 200lbs) for the first time in ten years!  This morning I weighed in at an even 199.  And that is a milestone.  It’s taken ten years, lots of searching, and lots of discipline.  But it’s working–and hopefully it will last.  I’d still like to lose another 30lbs, but for now I’m just enjoying a rather big personal moment.

I don’t know what milestones you need to achieve.  But I believe that God gives us the friends, the help, and the fortitude necessary to accomplish our goals, if we are willing.  Proverbs 16:3 says, “Commit to the Lord whatever you do and your plans will succeed.”