h1

“Americanized” Christianity

October 14, 2009

Americanized Christianity might sound a bit like “weaponized uranium.”  If it doesn’t, it probably should, because it’s just as dangerous.

Lately I’ve noticed far too much racism, bigotry and especially partisanship in the church to even call it Christian.  I am not picking on the church I lead in particular; however, I am picking on the American church in general.

Really, I’m picking on those who cannot separate their politics from their religion.  That is not to say that religion shouldn’t affect politics, it most certainly should.  Too many people, however, let their politics affect their religion (i.e. they cannot divorce their political persuasion from their interpretation of the teachings of Jesus).

Case in point: I have a Facebook Friend whose “friends” are discussing the merits of taking up arms in a bloody revolution against the US government.  These “friends” are all Bible-believing Christians (so to speak).  I know they are having a rhetorical discussion that is full of false bravado; but still, the fact that it’s an item for discussion betrays a great deal of ignorance regarding the teachings of Christ and His earliest followers.

If I sound arrogant here, I apologize; but working in a fairly-urban environment has taught me a number of humbling truths.  Of utmost importance: There are a great deal of faithful, Bible-believing Christians on either side of the political aisle.

Those who focus on justice for the unborn are generally conservative.  Those who focus on justice for the poor are generally liberal.  Those who focus on the independence-aspect of freedom are generally conservative.  Those who focus on the community-aspect of freedom are generally liberal.  Those who focus on individual morality are generally conservative.  And those who focus on social morality are generally liberal.

Ironically, and in regard to the above-mentioned issues, they all tout biblically-based, Christian principles.

One significant problem in Americanized Christianity is that the extremists on both sides would prefer to put a bullet in the head of those who disagree with them than to walk “two miles” with them; and this is surely not the way of Christ.

I’m not calling for political moderation.  Nor am I calling people to come together and just “get along.”  I’m asking Christians to study the teachings of Christ and consider: Would Jesus, in our context, be conservative or liberal; would He be capitalist or communist; would He be Republican or Democrat; would He be all-of-the-above or none-of-the-above?

Frankly, I’m not sure He’d have anything to do with any of us!

h1

Michael Moore, Capitalism & Christianity

October 5, 2009

Most of my readers know that I operate from a conservative viewpoint (see my bio-page and the previous post for that matter).  Although I am no partisan, I am not ashamed to be a conservative.  I believe the same values that made our nation strong will keep it strong:  Freedom, Independence, Liberty for All, Work Ethic, Justice and Fairness (as they are traditionally defined).  Capitalism is part of that system as well.

However, I also believe that we need to take spiritual inventory from time to time, as well as appreciate what the “other” viewpoints believe.  So I submit the following words from partisan filmmaker Michael Moore.  Some of his points are easily refutable.  Others are rather potent.  I’ll let you work it out in the ensuing discussion that is sure to take place.  Feel free to comment.

“Amidst all the Wall Street bad guys and corrupt members of Congress exposed in Capitalism: A Love Story, I pose a simple question in the movie: “Is capitalism a sin?” I go on to ask, “Would Jesus be a capitalist?” Would he belong to a hedge fund? Would he sell short? Would he approve of a system that has allowed the richest 1 percent to have more financial wealth than the 95 percent under them combined?

“I have come to believe that there is no getting around the fact that capitalism is opposite everything that Jesus (and Moses and Mohammed and Buddha) taught. All the great religions are clear about one thing: It is evil to take the majority of the pie and leave what’s left for everyone to fight over. Jesus said that the rich man would have a very hard time getting into heaven. He told us that we had to be our brother’s and sister’s keepers and that the riches that did exist were to be divided fairly. He said that if you failed to house the homeless and feed the hungry, you’d have a hard time finding the pin code to the pearly gates.

“I guess that’s bad news for us Americans. Here’s how we define “Blessed Are the Poor”: We now have the highest unemployment rate since 1983. There’s a foreclosure filing once every 7.5 seconds. 14,000 people every day lose their health insurance.

“At the same time, Wall Street bankers (“Blessed Are the Wealthy”?) are amassing more and more loot – and they do their best to pay little or no income tax (last year Goldman Sachs’ tax rate was a mere 1 percent!). Would Jesus approve of this? If not, why do we let such an evil system continue? It doesn’t seem you can call yourself a Capitalist and a Christian — because you cannot love your money and love your neighbor when you are denying your neighbor the ability to see a doctor just so you can have a better bottom line. That’s called “immoral” — and you are committing a sin when you benefit at the expense of others.”

Gospel According to Matt’s Opinion:  Jesus would have been neither capitalist nor socialist.  He would have been something else altogether.  What say you?

You can read Moore’s editorial in it’s entirity at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-moore/for-those-of-you-on-your_b_308948.html

h1

Christian Morality and the Medical-Care Debate

September 11, 2009

The following contains an excerpt from a speech given by theologian John Robbins, in a debate with C. Everett Koop, during the Clintonian attempt to nationalize healthcare in the early 1990’s.

Dr. C. Everett Koop, who will be our featured speaker this evening, has challenged everyone to debate political health care, and I rise to accept his challenge. Dr. Koop supports the President’s Health Security Plan. In his advocacy of politicized medicine, Dr. Koop has written:

Before we can enact the sweeping reform that I think must take place, I think we have to agree on the basic values and ethics upon which our health care system, and our whole society, indeed, is based and from which we draw our moral power. I am convinced that if we could reach an ethical consensus, many of the economic and political problems would fall into place rather easily.(2)

In focusing first on ethics, Dr. Koop has correctly re-cognized the more important part of the health care debate. Economics is at best secondary, and I shall discuss it in second place. Ethics is of greater importance. Theology is of first importance.

Now what precisely are those basic values and ethics upon which our “whole society is based and from which we draw our moral power?” Certainly the single most important moral value – the moral value that has given the United States whatever moral authority it has had and still has in the world, the moral value which has attracted tens of millions to our shores and created the most humane society of modern times – is individual liberty. Individual liberty logically and historically depends on several other values, among which are the following:

1. The sovereignty of God. In political terms this means that God – not the state, society, race, class, Volk, or church – is the source of security. The modern idolatry of state and politics, for which the economist Ludwig von Mises coined the word “statolatry,” is the cause of the horrific government- caused suffering that has afflicted the modern world, making the twentieth century the bloodiest century in the Christian era. The medieval idolatry of the church, ecclesiolatry, is responsible for most of the suffering and persecution of Christians during the Middle Ages.

2. Limited government. The sovereignty of God entails the limited power and authority of all human institutions. The Constitution of the United States created a government of enumerated and limited powers. Within that government, there is a separation of powers, so that no man or department exercises all the power of even a limited government. Only God, not men, is to be trusted with power. A night-watchman state, such as that suggested by the Apostle Paul in Romans 13, is a basic moral value of American society.

3. The primacy of the individual. The importance of the individual – rooted in the Reformation’s recovery of the Bible’s doctrines of individual election, individual regeneration, individual justification, individual sanctification, individual responsibility before God at the final judgment, personal immortality in Heaven (or Hell), justification by belief alone, and the priesthood of all believers – is a basic value of American society. From it are derived all the various individual freedoms and protections we enjoy: religion, press, speech, association, privacy, private arms, no self-incrimination, trial by jury, no double jeopardy, and freedom of contract.

4. Private property. The mention of freedom of contract calls to mind the idea of private property. No one can seriously deny that private property is one of the basic values of both the Bible and American society. It has been under heavy attack in the twentieth century by atavistic and criminal collectivists who wish either to abolish it or to redistribute it by political means. “Thou shalt not steal” applies to all, both rulers and private citizens. Rulers routinely violate the commandment by taxation, expropriation, and inflation.

5. The Protestant work ethic. What Max Weber called the Protestant work ethic is itself a bundle of economic virtues: Honesty, punctuality, diligence, obedience to the Fourth Commandment – six days you shall labor; obedience to the Eighth Commandment, you shall not steal; and obedience to the Tenth Commandment, you shall not covet. A recognition of the significance of productive work as glorifying God grew out of the Bible and the Reformation.

6. Individual responsibility. The Bible clearly makes each man responsible for himself, both in this world and the world to come. In economics, Paul says that he who will not work shall not eat. Paul recognized no entitlement to the property of another based on need.

7. Generosity. Perhaps no people has been as generous to those unable to help themselves as Americans. This is a consequence of two factors: Christianity and capitalism. But compassion, generosity, and capitalism have been under attack throughout the twentieth century by those who wish to substitute envy and compulsion. Compulsory charity is, of course, a contradiction in terms.

8. The rule of law. The rule of law, based upon legal principles found in the Bible, includes three major ideas: (1) that settled law, not executive decrees, regulations, or ordinances, is the only proper guide for social conduct; (2) that laws must be both clear and non-absurd, that is, capable of being understood by all and non-contradictory; and (3) that the laws apply equally to all, including rulers.

9. Federalism. Modeled on Presbyterian church government, the federal system is a system in which no government has a monopoly of jurisdiction. This division of powers, like the separation of powers, is designed to fragment political power so that it cannot threaten the lives, liberties, and property of the people.

10. Republicanism. Republicanism entails not only the idea of limited government, but the notion that monarchies are not proper forms of human government, that they are in fact rejections of divine kingship, and that proper human governments are elected by the people. It was not only the nation of Israel that sinned by asking for a king, but pagan nations around them and throughout history have sinned that way as well.

These are the moral values of America, which have given America whatever moral power and authority it has enjoyed and still enjoys in the world. If we subvert or abandon these values, we will have lost both our moral power and our society. National health care, such as that proposed by the Clintons and Dr. Koop, opposes and subverts every one of these moral values.

You can read the speech in its entirety at http://www.trinityfoundation.org/latest.php

h1

Psalm 57:5 & Tozer’s Prayer

September 10, 2009

Psalm 57:5 says, “Be thou exalted, O God, above the heavens; let thy glory be above the earth.”

“O God, be Thou exalted over my possessions.  Nothing of earth’s treasures shall seem dear unto me if only Thou art glorified in my life.

“Be Thou exalted over my friendships.  I am determined that  Thou shalt be above all, though I must stand deserted and alone in the midst of the earth.

“Be Thou exalted above my comforts.  Thought it mean the loss of bodily comforts and the carrying of heavy crosses I shall keep my vow made this day before Thee.

“Be Thou exalted over my reputation.  Make me ambitious to please Thee even if as a result I must sink into obscurity and my name be forgotten as a dream.  Rise, O Lord, into Thy proper place of honor, above my ambitions, above my likes and dislikes, above my family, my health and even my life itself.

“Let me decrease that Thou mayest increase, let me sink that Thou mayest rise above.  Ride forth upon me as Thou didst ride into Jerusalem mounted upon a the humblest little beast, a colt, the foal of an ass, and let me hear the children cry to Thee, ‘Hosanna in the highest.’”

A. W. Tozer, “Restoring the Creator-Creature Relation,” The Pursuit after God

h1

Self-Examination & the Christian

September 8, 2009

2 Corinthians 13:5 says, “Examine yourselves to see whether you are in the faith; test yourselves.”

What a potent challenge!  We need to look inward not outward to examine ourselves—not others.  What are some examination question we might ask ourselves?

1. Do I believe in one God, and one Faith, and one way to God in Jesus Christ?

2. Am I filled with the Holy Spirit of God, received in faith, at the time of my baptism?

3. Do I allow biblical values/ethics/morals to trump my own personal values/ethics/morals?

4. Do I, as a disciple of Jesus Christ, share my faith with those around me who do not know God?

5.  Am I filled with compassion, rather than judgment, when faced with suffering people in need?

6. Do I respond to suffering with generosity—serving and giving to those in need?

7. Do I love the Church, the Bride of Christ, despite her spots/blemishes/sins?  Do I believe that He is perfecting and preparing her for eternity?

8. Am I more godly and Christ-like today than I was yesterday, more this year than last year; more than I was before I met Christ?

These are just some of the questions that I might need to ask myself?  You might come up with a similar or dissimilar list of questions, but the point remains that we have a responsibility to “test/examine” ourselves to see if we “are in the faith.”

h1

Being Jesus, at Home.

August 29, 2009

Why is it so much harder to live like Jesus, at home?  I pondered this question as I passed through my neighborhood, on my way home from the grocery store.

I was thinking about one of the kiddos a couple of blocks away who spends quite a bit of time at our house.  During the Summer time, he leaves his house when he gets out of bed, and doesn’t really go home until dusk.  Half the time, we’re feeding him dinner and giving him basic adult supervision.  And at least three times per evening during the school year he rings our doorbell, wanting to play.  He’s pretty respectful to my wife and I, but doesn’t play real well with our boys, especially when other friends are visiting.  If often find myself frustrated with him, and especially with his lone parent who spends more time with potential mates than with the kids.

Why do I have such a hard time acting like Jesus, at home?  When at Church, I get to help people in such circumstances all the time.  And I generally do it with a cheerful spirit.  When I see single moms, or struggling families, or broken lives, my heart breaks for them.  I want to reach out to them, help them, serve them, and hopefully restore them.  But when I’m home, it’s a lot harder.  Would hypocrite be the operative word?  I hope not.

Why do I have such a hard time acting like Jesus, to my family?  It’s not just toward the neighbor kid, but toward my family as well.  I’m much more gracious with the kids at church than I am with my own kids.  I’m much more forgiving with the people at church than I am toward my own wife.  And I’m much more generous with the folks at church than I am with the folks in my home.

So what’s the deal, anyway?  If you have good answers to any of these questions, I would appreciate your responses.  I don’t really know the answer.  But I do no that I’m not as much like Jesus as I’d like to be!  My most natural self is evident at home, and that’s the hardest place for me to live like Jesus; which means I’ve got a long journey ahead of me, in my pursuit of “Christ-likeness.”

h1

Hand Sanitizers & American Christianity

August 21, 2009

In a micro-biology article, Regina Bailey tells us that: “Antibacterial hand sanitizers are marketed to the public as an effective way to wash one’s hands when traditional soap and water are not available.  These waterless products are particularly popular with parents of small children.  The manufacturers claim that the sanitizers kill 99% of germs.  Since you naturally use hand sanitizers to cleanse your hands, the assumption is that 99% of the [harmful] germs [on your hands] are killed by the sanitizers.  Recent research, however, suggests that this is not the case.

“Hand sanitizers work by stripping away the outer layer of oil on the skin and prevent bacteria in the body from coming to the surface of the hand.  However, the bacteria normally present in the body are not the kinds of bacteria that will make us sick.  In a review of the research, a professor at Purdue University, who teaches safe sanitation practices, came to an interesting conclusion, noting that hand sanitizers do not significantly reduce the bacteria on the hands, and may [actually] increase the bacteria.[1]

When I read this article I chuckled to myself for two reasons.  The first is because I’m nearly addicted to this stuff and apparently it isn’t doing me any good at all.  The second reason is because the parallels between hand sanitizers and traditional American Christianity are endless.

It’s like we’ve got this substance that can destroy all the bad stuff in our lives and in our world, but we have no idea how to actually make it work.  And so we smear it on the surface of our lives, and it might make us look clean and it might even kill some of the surface problems, but it doesn’t really sink in and make a difference.  So we interact with Christianity, and we get this pure-clean feeling, but we’re just fooling ourselves. Too often we are like the religious leaders that Jesus called “white-washed tombs.”  We are shiny and clean on the outside, but not on the spiritual inside.

It makes me think of the people addressed in 2Timothy 3:5 who “have a form of godliness” but “deny it’s power.”

 


[1] Accessed at, http://biology.about.com/od/microbiology/a/handsanitizers.htm, on August 20, 2009.

h1

The Real Meaning of “Christian”

August 19, 2009

One of the primary tests of Christianity is that we walk in the footsteps of Jesus.  Not just that we believe in Him, not just that we trust Him for salvation, but that we walk in His steps.  I’m not talking about His culture and customs, nor am I talking about securing salvation, I’m talking about our life-patterns.  Do our habits and patterns look anything like Jesus?  Do we care about the things Jesus cared about?  Do we talk about the things Jesus talked about?  Do we seek out the kinds of people Jesus sought out?  Do we love the things that Jesus loved and hate the things that Jesus hated?  Do we live like Jesus called us to live?  Real Christians walk in the footsteps of Jesus.

1 John 2:3-6 says: We know that we have come to know Him if we obey his commands.  The man who says, “I know him,” but does not do what He commands is a liar and the truth is not in him.  But if anyone obeys His word, God’s love is truly made complete in Him.  This is how we know we are in Him: Whoever claims to live in Him must walk as Jesus did.

We can sum up this Scripture into three tests of Christian authenticity: (1) Real Christians obey His commands; (2) Real Christians embrace His truths; and (3) Real Christians walk in His footsteps.

1 John 2:3 makes it clear that true followers obey the commands of Christ.  It’s pretty simple: If we don’t obey Christ, then we aren’t true Christians.  The biblical word for obey in verse 3 means “to watch, to observe, and to keep an eye on” something.

When I was a boy, and when my mom would suspect that I was up to no good, she would say, “Matt, I’ve got my eyes on you!”  And then when I’d get caught for something I was sure I’d gotten away with, Mom would say, “I’ve got eyes in the back of my head.”  If you’re a parent then you know how important it is to keep your eyes on your children at all times.  Whether they’re in the house, or outside playing, or away at school or at some sporting event, every parent bears the responsibility of keeping their eyes on their children.

True Christians likewise bear the responsibility of keeping their eyes on the commands of Christ—that’s what obedience means—that they observe, watch, and consider His commands as they go about their lives.  1 John 5:3 says, “This is love for God: to obey His commands.”

Obedience plays itself out in two ways: We embrace His truth and we walk in His steps.  We accept what He says as gospel truth, even if it conflicts with our own values and preconceived notions.  And we pattern our lives after His life, even if it means that we have to change some of our habits and behaviors.

Real Christians obey His commands, embrace His truths, and walk in His footsteps.  Sadly, I think there are many people who wear the name “Christian,” who are nothing of the sort.  May this not be said of me.  What say you?

h1

Tozer on “The Importance of Self-Judgment”

August 11, 2009

Right now I’m reading a lot of material authored by A.W. Tozer who seems a bit grumpy at times, but a bit prophetic as well.  The following are some excerpts from his book “The Incredible Christian” that talk about the importance of looking inward and discovering (and judging) our true selves.

“Hardly anything else reveals so well the fear and uncertainty among men as the length to which they will go to hide their true selves from each other and even from their own eyes.”

“Self-knowledge is so critically important to us in our pursuit of God and His righteousness that we lie under heavy obligation to do immediately whatever is necessary to remove the disguise and permit our real selves to be known.”

Rules for Self-Discovery (We may be known by the following):

1. What we want most.  “Ask your heart: What would you rather have than anything else in the world?”

2. What we think about most. “The true test is what we think about voluntarily.”

3. How we use our money. “We must pay taxes and provide for the necessities of life…, but whatever money is left to do with as we please—that will tell us a great deal indeed.”

4. What we do with our leisure time.  “Most people waste [free time] staring at the television, listening to the radio, reading the cheap output of the press or engaging in idle chatter.  What I do with mine reveals the kind of man I am.”

5. The company we enjoy.  ”Where we go, when we are free to go where we will, is a near-infallible index of character.”

6. Whom and what we admire.  “We can learn the true state of our minds by examining our unexpressed admirations.”

7. What we laugh at.  “Lacking a sense of humor we fall that much short of healthy humanity.  But the test we are running here is not whether we laugh or not, but what we laugh at.”

Warren W. Wiersbe (ed.), The Best of A.W. Tozer, Book One, (Camp Hill, PA: Baker Book House Co., 1978), pp. 109-111.

h1

This Post is Worth Reading

August 8, 2009

I’ve been mostly busy and out of town the last month so I haven’t had much time to Blog.  But this blog is worth reading.  I hope you will check it out:  http://experimentaltheology.blogspot.com/2009/08/bait-and-switch-of-contemporary.html